Since 1970, Indonesian government t

Since 1970, Indonesian government tried to increase rice production through system of intensification (Green Revolution). Practiced the system has made Indonesia to achieve rice self-sufficiency in 1984. On the other hand, the system practice has socioeconomic, health and ecological impacts, such as soil degradation, water pollution and health problems cautilized by chemical residues (from pesticides). Farmers have been highly depended on industrial sector for their chemical fertilizers and pesticides causing farmers less autonomous. Over utilize of N and P fertilizers in paddy fields, causing several ecological impacts, such as: declining soil fertility, nutrient deficiency, soil and water pollution (due to fertilizers and pesticides), erosion and greenhoutilize effects In addition, chemical residues in rice commodities due to the utilize of pesticides have had negative impacts to human health. (Nugraheni et al., 2013). To eliminate the impact of system of rice intensification, the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) practice has been introduced Indonesia since 1999, and in South Sulawesi since 2000 by Japanese ODA through the decentralized irrigation system improvement management project (DISIMP). Beside that, Central and Local Government have encouraged farmers to practices by giving helps both in variable input and training. Unfortunately, Sato et al.(2011) who studied SRI application by farmers for four years in South Sulawesi, found that although SRI increased land productivity and became more efficient in production, but the adoption level of SRIwas low, only 10% farmers who adopted SRI.
Besides low of adoption rates, the other controversy about SRI adoption in Indonesia and many developing countries are high of dis-adoption (abandonment) rates (Sugarda et al., 2008; Natawidjaja et al., 2008; Namara et al., 2003). Abandonment is part of the adoption cycle that has historically been overlooked, despite the fact that technologies that are abandoned are as ineffective as technologies that are not adopted. In contrast to the vast number of empirical studies on technology adoption, little empirical evidence exists on the post-adoption behaviour of farmers (Oladele, 2005; Moser and Barrett, 2002 Pedzisa et al., 2015). This study differs from the previous studies by focusing on post adoption behavior of farmers. Our study is to explain factors that determine of post‐adoption behaviour of small scale farmers in practicing of SRI method. Since small scale farmers that use SRI methods. Therefore, the objective of this study is to enhance our limited understanding about post adoption behaviour of small scale farmers.

Hasil (Inggris) 2:

Since 1970, the Indonesian government tried to increase of production through system of rice intensification (Green Revolution). Practiced the system has made ​​Indonesia to Achieve rice self-sufficiency in 1984. On the other hand, the system has Socioeconomic practice, health and ecological impacts, such as soil degradation, water pollution and health problems cautilized by chemical residues (from pesticides). Farmers have been highly depended on the industrial sector for chemical fertilizers and pesticides Reviews their farmers causing less autonomous. Over Utilize of N and P fertilizers in paddy fields, causing Several ecological impacts, such as: declining soil fertility, nutrient deficiency, soil and water pollution (due to fertilizers and pesticides), erosion and greenhoutilize effects In addition, chemical residues in rice commodities due to the Utilize of pesticides have had negative impacts to human health. (Nugraheni et al., 2013). To Eliminate the impact of the system of rice intensification, the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) practices has been Introduced Indonesia since 1999, and in South Sulawesi since 2000 by Japanese ODA through the decentralized system of irrigation management improvement project (Saved). Beside that, the Central and Local Governments have encouraged farmers to practices by giving helps both in variable inputs and training. Unfortunately, Sato et al. (2011) who studied SRI application by farmers for four years in South Sulawesi, found that Although SRI Increased land productivity and Became more efficient in production, but the adoption level of SRIwas low, only 10% of farmers who-adopted SRI.
Besides low of adoption rates, the other controversy about SRI adoption in Indonesia and many developing countries are high of dis-adoption (abandonment) rates (Sugarda et al., 2008; Natawidjaja et al., 2008; Namara et al., 2003). Abandonment is part of the adoption cycle that has historically been overlooked, despite the fact that technologies that are abandoned are as ineffective as technologies that are not-adopted. In contrast to the vast number of empirical studies on technology adoption, little empirical evidence exists on the post-adoption behavior of farmers (Oladele, 2005; Moser and Barrett, 2002 Pedzisa et al., 2015). This study differs from previous studies by focusing on post-adoption behavior of farmers. Our study is to explain factors that Determine of post-adoption behavior of small scale farmers in practicing of SRI method. Since small scale farmers that use SRI methods. Therefore, the objective of this study is to Enhance our limited understanding about post-adoption behavior of small scale farmers.