Criteria for the determination of the value of the irirgasi system performance based on Candy PU No. 32/PRT/M/2007 are described as follows.1. The value weights between 80 – 100 excellent performance2. The value of weight between 70 – 79 good performance3. The value weights between 55 – 69 performance less and need attention4. The value weights between 54 and ugly performance < need attentionCalculation of Irrigation system performance assessment Sub in the West has a value of Maneunteung 86,49%. Whereas the calculation of the performance assessment system of Irrigation in Eastern Maneunteung have Sub value 88,63%. Based on the value in the network then the criteria seen Irrigation Maneunteung Irrigation Network of Western and Eastern Maneunteung has excellent performance. The analysis and Test Data the respondents based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)In analysis and test data on respondents will be explained about the steps undertaken in the analysis and test data with respondents using model Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) as well as software Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) AMOS (analysis of Moment Structures). Of the review of the literature and a framework of thought that has been described in the previous chapter, subtitles in general models of SEM regarding penilitian has 6 independent variables (Exogenous) and 1 dependent variable (Endogenous) and 3 variable results (Depend).Six independent variables in question is the physical Infrastructure (X 1 or ξ1), crop Productivity (X 2 or ξ2), means of Supporting OP (X 3 or ξ3), the Organization Implementing the human resources OP (X 4 or ξ4), documentation (X 5 or ξ5), documentation (X 6 or ξ6), while the dependent variable is the performance of irrigation systems (η) and variable results (depend) Qmax/Qmin is the index increased pertanaman (Y1), increasing crop yields (Y2), vast underserved water increases (Y3). Of the variables are arranged in the form of flowcharts. The flowchart of the next structural equations are compiled, and continued with determination technique of estimation. This technique is done gradually through the estimation model by means of the technique of measurment confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation models continued with. It is intended to look at the suitability of the model and the relationship of causality to be built.Before performed technique of estimation, conducted test data do follow a normal distribution or not by using program SPSS ver 22. If there is data on the respondents who do not follow a normal distribution of data transformation to be performed so that meet the assumption of a normal distribution.Test Data Analysis with KonfirmatoriAt this stage of the analysis will be performed to test for multidimensional konfirmatori of an invalid constructs with latent variables. Each Analysis is also testing the validity of a theoretical invalid constructs. Each latent variable used in the study was formed based on the theoretical concepts with several indicators or manifest. Analysis of konfirmatori further test whether such indicators is a valid indicator of measuring latent as invalid constructs. In other words, whether the indicators are the mutidimensi of a latent, or invalid constructs instead of mutidimensi.The next step is testing or analysis of the model of SEM in full. Testing the model against the Structural Equation Models (SEM) performed with two testing, i.e. testing the suitability of the model and test of significance test of regression coefficient through causality. Model used for analysis is a model of recursive model where all arrows have one direction without rotation of the feedback, so as not to be correlated with other variables. Calculation analysis of konfirmatori performed using SPSS software version AMOSTM 22 as shown in Figure 3.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
