Barthes suggests that every text is

Barthes suggests that every text is a continuation of previous texts where different ideas, concepts, and cultural backgrounds meet and fight each others. In other words, every creation of a text always involves particular prior raferences.
Teeuw defines intertextuality as the relation between texts. The principles of intertextuality came from French structuralism which was later influenced by writings from Jacques Derrida and Roland Barthes and debeloped futher by Julia Kristeva. It is based idea that every text can only be read using the help of other texts. Kristeva implies that the presence of other texts is inevitable. This means that any element from any text has possibility to present in any text. In other words, every btext follows certain rules from literary and language conventions before it exist. This makes every text is always affected by its previous text.
Similar perspective is given by Pradopo. He states that every work of literature has some kind of historical attachments with its prior texts and later text. In addition, Ratna believes that words are intersection of textual impression, dialogue between their author and readers, responders, characters, and their socio-cultural context. Literary structure ia always seen as connected to other structures and always read through the help from other texts. The idea of intertextuality is to put text to its socio-historical context.

Hasil (Inggris) 1:

Barthes suggests that every text is a continuation of previous texts where different ideas, concepts, and cultural backgrounds meet and fight each others. In other words, every creation of a text always involves particular prior raferences.Teeuw defines intertextuality as the relation between texts. The principles of intertextuality came from French structuralism which was later influenced by writings from Jacques Derrida and Roland Barthes and Julia Kristeva futher by debeloped. It is based the idea that every text can only be read using the help of other texts. Kristeva implies that the presence of other texts is inevitable. This means that any element from any text has the possibility to present in any text. In other words, every btext follows certain rules from literary and language conventions before it exist. This makes every text is always affected by its previous text.Similar perspective is given by Pradopo. He states that every work of literature has some kind of historical attachments with its texts and later the prior text. In addition, Ratna believes that words are intersection of textual impression, dialogue between their author and readers, responders, characters, and their socio-cultural context. Literary structure he always seen the U.S. connected to other structures and always read through the help from other texts. The idea of intertextuality is to put text to its socio-historical context.

Hasil (Inggris) 2:

Barthes Suggests that every text is a continuation of previous texts where different ideas, concepts, and cultural backgrounds meet and fight each others. In other words, every creation of a text always involves particular prior raferences.
Teeuw defines intertextuality as the relation between texts. The principles of intertextuality Came from French structuralism which was later influenced by Writings from Jacques Derrida and Roland Barthes and debeloped futher by Julia Kristeva. It is based the idea that every text can only be read using the help of other texts. Kristeva implies that the presence of other texts is Inevitable. This means that any element from any text has possibility to present in any text. In other words, every btext follows Certain rules from literary and language conventions before it exist. This makes every text is always affected by its previous text.
Similar perspective is given by Pradopo. He states that every work of literature has some kind of historical attachments with its prior texts and later text. In addition, Ratna Believes that words are the intersection of textual impression, Reviews their dialogue between author and readers, responders, characters, and their socio-cultural context. Literary structure he was always seen as connected to other structures and always read through the help from other texts. The idea of intertextuality is to put the text to its socio-historical context.