Setelah dianalisis, terlihaat bahwa

Setelah dianalisis, terlihaat bahwa kedua media memiliki frame yang berbeda dalam menyikapi masalah Penangkapan Irman Gusman. Tempo.co lebih menilai apa yang dilakukan oleh Irman Gusman adalah perbuatan yang sangat tercela, karena memperdagangkan pengaruh. Sedangkan Sindonews.com lebih mempertanyakan penangkapan Irman Gusman, karena dalam pemberitaan Sindonews.com menyatakan bahwa penangkapan tersebut penuh dengan kejanggalan dan ada indikasi penangkapan tersebut adalah jebakan.

Hasil (Inggris) 1:

Once analyzed, terlihaat that both media have different frames in addressing the issue of the arrest of Irman Gusman. Tempo.co better judge what was done by Irman Gusman is a very despicable deeds, because trading in influence. Whereas Sindonews.com further questioned the arrest Irman Gusman, because in the preaching of the Sindonews.com stated that the arrests were riddled with irregularities and no indication that the arrest was a trap.

Hasil (Inggris) 2:

Once analyzed, terlihaat that the media have a different frame in addressing the problem Arrest Irman Gusman. Tempo.co better assess what is done by Irman Gusman is a reprehensible act, because trade influence. While Sindonews.com further questioned the arrest Irman Gusman, because in reporting Sindonews.com stated that the arrest was filled with irregularities and there are indications that the arrest was a trap.