a. many teachers who contended that with this latest curriculum teachers do not need to explain the material. Whereas we know that studying mathematics, physics, etc. is not enough just to read only. The role of the teacher as a facilitator remains necessary, especially in terms of motivating students to actively learn.
b. the majority of teachers are not ready. Never mind the making of creative students, Sometimes his teacher was less creative. It is necessary for training and education in order to change the paradigm of the teacher as the giver of the material into a teacher who can motivate students to be creative.In addition teachers should be spurred its ability to enhance professionalism skills continuously. For example, in Singapore, in a year of teacher training are entitled to during the 100 hours.
c. scientific approach Concept is still not well understood, let alone about the method of learning that less applicative delivered.
e. Teachers also never involved directly in the process of developing a curriculum of 2013. The Government looked as if teachers and students to have the same capacity.
f.2013 set curriculum without any evaluation of the implementation of the previous curriculum i.e. KTSP.
g. preparation of appropriate learning materials has not been coherently stage thinking students, teachers must sort and define the essential material considering the material that must be mastered pretty much students.
h.The curriculum content is still too dense, indicated by the number of subjects and a lot of material that goes beyond the scope and ability level of students kesukarannya
i. Standard learning process illustrates the sequence of learning that less detail so the opportunites interpretation of the multi-faceted and culminate in a learning-centered teachers.
j. Material too extensive, less immersive.
k. learning Loads too heavy, so learning time in school for too long.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..