Namun sistem ini memiliki kelemahan

Namun sistem ini memiliki kelemahan dari faktor financial, yakni menghabiskan biaya yang lebih banyak dan tidak sedikit. Selain untuk biaya penyelenggaraannya, political cost yang harus dikeluarkan oleh kandidat juga sangat besar, sebab mereka perlu menyiapkan anggaran untuk atribut, kampanye, dan kegiatan sosial lainnya, bahkan tak jarang para kandidat juga membayar langsung pada para pemilih agar bisa memenangkan pertarungan. Sehingga hal ini juga dapat memicu tingginya tingkat kemungkinan korupsi oleh para kandidat yang nantinya terpilih, untuk mengganti biaya yang sebelumnya telah ia keluarkan.

Hasil (Inggris) 1:

But this system has weaknesses of financial factors, i.e. cost more and not less. In addition to the cost of its commissioning, the political cost to be incurred by the candidate are also very large, because they need to prepare a budget for the campaign, attributes, and other social activities, in fact often the candidates also pay directly at voters in order to win the fight. So that this can also trigger potentially high rates of corruption by the candidates who later voted to replace a previous stay he had issued.

Hasil (Inggris) 2:

However, this system has the disadvantage of financial factors, which cost more and not less. In addition to the cost of implementation, the political cost that must be incurred by the candidate are also very large, because they need to prepare a budget for the attribute, campaigns, and other social activities, in fact rarely the candidates also pay directly to the voters in order to win the fight. So this can also lead to high levels of possible corruption by the candidates who will elect, to reimburse that he had previously been issued.