Ketidakcukupan akan modal serta ket

Ketidakcukupan akan modal serta keterbatasan kemampuan dalam pengelolaan sumber daya alam terutama hasil-hasil tambang yang dimiliki, sehingga pemerintah melakukan upaya guna pengusahaan bahan tambang tersebut melalui berbagai bentuk kerjasama dengan pihak asing salah satunya dengan sistem kontrak karya. Isu renegosiasi kontrak karya PT. Freeport terus bergulir akhir-akhir ini, kritikan tajam terutama ditujukan pada pemerintah karena tidak mampu bersikap tegas sebagai pemerintah (negara) untuk menegakkan ketentuan-ketentuan baru yang ada semenjak berlakunya UU No. 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batu Bara terhadap Pihak PT. Freeport Indonesia (PTFI). Sehingga beranjak dari hal tersebut penulis ingin menganalisis Kedudukan pemerintah dalam kontrak karya dan bagaimana urgensi regenosiasi isi substansi kontrak karya dengan keberlakuan UU No. 4 Tahun 2009. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan analisis berdasakan Teori yang dikemukakan oleh Hans Kelsen tentang Negara dalam kedudukannya pada lapangan hukum privat dan berdasarkan asas-asas hukum perjanjian. Data primer yang penulis gunakan adalah peraturan perundang-undangan, buku-buku, jurnal, artikel yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan yang penulis akan kaji. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Negara ketika mengadakan kontrak (Kontrak Karya) dalam lapangan hukum privat harus dianggap sama dengan pihak lainnya dalam kontrak. Sama halnya dengan kedudukan pemerintah (negara) dalam kontrak karya tanpa melihat kedudukan utamanya sebagai negara (hukum publik).

Hasil (Inggris) 1:

The insufficiency of capital as well as the limited ability will be in natural resource management is mainly the results of mine who owned, so the Government made efforts to mine the material-working through various forms of cooperation with foreign parties by contract work. The issue of the renegosiasi contract work of PT. Freeport continue to roll lately, sharp criticism is primarily aimed at the Government for not being able to be assertive as a Government (the State) to enforce the new provisions that exist since the enactment of Act No. 4 of 2009 about Mineral and Coal Mining side PT. Freeport Indonesia (PTFI). So moving on from this author wants to analyze the position of the Government in the contract works and how the urgency of regenosiasi the content of the substance of the contract work with the enforceability of Act No. 4 of 2009. The research method used was the normative research using an approach to analysis of the theory advanced by Hans Kelsen on the country in his position on the field is private law and based on the principles of the law of treaties. Primary data that authors use is legislation, books, journals, articles related to the problems that the author will examine. The results of this study concluded that Country when contracting (contract Work) in the private law field should be considered the same as the other party in the contract. Same is the case with the position of the Government (State) in the contract work without seeing his primary position as a State (public law).

Hasil (Inggris) 2:

Insufficiency of capital and limited ability in the management of natural resources, especially the results of mines owned, so the government made efforts to exploitation of minerals through various forms of cooperation with foreign parties one by the contract system works. PT works contract renegotiation issues. Freeport continues to roll lately, especially the sharp criticism directed at the government for not being able to be firm as the government (state) to enforce the new provisions that existed since the enactment of Law No. 4 Year 2009 on Mineral and Coal of the Parties to the PT. Freeport Indonesia (PTFI). Thus moved from the authors want to analyze The position of the government in contract work and how the content of the substance of urgency regenosiasi work contract with the applicability of Law No. 4 in 2009. The method used is normative research using analytical approach Based on the theory put forward by Hans Kelsen on the position of the State in the field of private law and is based on principles of contract law. Primary data that I use is the legislation, books, journals, articles relating to the problems that the author will be examined. Results of this study concluded that the State when entering into a contract (CoW) in the field of private law should be considered together with the other party to the contract. Similarly, the position of the government (state) in the work contract without seeing the main position as a state (public law).