Lebih jauh yang dimaksud dengan sif

Lebih jauh yang dimaksud dengan sifat memaksa di sini yaitu supaya peraturan perundang-undangan dipatuhi/ ditaati. Melalui cara yang memaksa tersebut maka ketertiban dalam masyarakat bisa terwujud serta tidak akan menimbulkan anarkhi. Sifat memaksa di sini juga termasuk mempunyai kekuasaan secara legal untuk melakukan kekerasan fisik.Untuk melakukan itu negara memakai perangkat-perangkat seperti badan peradilan, tentara dan polisi. Sifat memaksa ini tidak akan begitu menonjol kalau masyarakatnya bersifat homogen dan terdapat konsensus nasional tentang tujuan-tujuan bersama yang kuat. Sebaliknya sifat memaksa akan sangat menonjol jika negara baru berdiri dan rakyatnya bersifat heterogen dan ikatan konsensus tentang tujuan bersama tidak begitu kuat.Meskipun demikian, dalam prakteknya di negara demokratis sifat memaksa tidak diutamakan, tetapi yang diutamakan yaitu meyakinkan (persuasi). Sifat memaksa yang dimiliki oleh Negara, kalau dikaitkan dengan pendapat Philipus M Hadjonadanya pengakuan bahwa Indonesia adalah negara berdasarkan hukum, mengandung konsekuensi pula terhadap pengakuan harkat dan martabat manusia, siifat memaksa tersebut tidak boleh ada kewenang-wenang yang dilakukan oleh siapapun terhadap siapapun. Dalam konstek pembangunan system hukum di Indonesia selalu dipengaruhi oleh konfigurasi politik, yang oleh Moh.Mahfud MD Menyatakan bahwa konfigurasi politik diartikan sebagai susunan atau konstelasi kekuatan politik yang secara dikotomi dibagi atas dua konsep yang bertentangan secara diametral, yaitu konfigurasi politik demokratis dan konfigurasi politik otoriter.Selanjutnya dijelaskan konfigurasi politik demokratis adalah susunan sistem politik yang membuka kesempatan (peluang) bagi partisipasi rakyat secara penuh untuk ikut aktif menentukan kebijaksanaan umum, sedangkan konfigurasi politik otoriter adalah susunan sistem politik yang lebih memungkinkan negara berperan sangat aktif serta mengambil hampir seluruh inisiatif dalam pembuatan kebijaksanaan negara.Konfigurasi politik akan berpengaruh pada produk hukum. Produk hukum yang responsif adalah produk hukum yang mencerminkan rasa keadilan dan memenuhi harapan masyarakat.Produk hukum ini berbeda dengan produk hukum konservatif/ortodok/elitis yaitu produk hukum yang isinya lebih mencerminkan visi sosial elit politik, lebih mencerminkan keinginan pemerintah, sehingga lebih bersifat positivis-instrumentalia, yaitu menjadi alat pelaksanaan ideologi dan program negara.

Hasil (Inggris) 1:

Further is the nature of the force here is that the legislation complied / followed. Through the way that forces the order within the community can be realized and will not lead to anarchy. The nature of force here also includes legally have the power to physical violence.
To do that countries use devices such as the judiciary, the army and police. The nature of this force would not be so prominent if society is homogeneous and there is a national consensus on common goals is strong. On the contrary nature of the force will be very prominent if the newly established state and its people are heterogeneous and bonding consensus on common goals is not so strong.
However, in practice in democratic countries do not force the nature of preferred, but preferred is assured (persuasion). The nature of force which is owned by the State, that is associated with the opinion of Philip M Hadjon
recognition that Indonesia is a state based on law, has consequences also to the recognition of human dignity, siifat such force should not be any kewenang-treatment committed by anyone against anyone. Konstek development in the legal system in Indonesia has always been influenced by the political configuration, which by Moh.Mahfud MD Stating that political configuration is defined as an arrangement or constellation of political forces in the dichotomy divided into two diametrically opposed concepts, namely the configuration of democratic politics and authoritarian political configuration ,
Further described democratic political configuration is the arrangement of the political system opens opportunities
(opportunities) for full participation by the people to actively determine public policy, whereas authoritarian political configuration is the arrangement of political system allows the state plays a very active and takes up almost the entire initiative in policy-making country.
Political configuration will affect the legal product. Responsive legal products is a legal product that reflects the sense of justice and meet the expectations of different masyarakat.Produk this law with a legal product conservative / orthodox / elitist ie laws which better reflect the contents of the political elite's social vision, better reflect the wishes of the government, so it is positivis- instrumental, to be an instrument of ideology and program execution state.

Hasil (Inggris) 2:

Furthermore, that is meant by the forcing nature here is that the legislation is obeyed/adhered to. By means of the force, the order in society can be realized and will not cause anarkhi. The pushy nature here also includes having legal power to commit physical violence.
To do that the country uses devices such as judicial bodies, soldiers and police. This forced nature will not be so prominent if the community is homogeneous and there is a national consensus on strong common goals. Conversely the nature of force would be very prominent if the new state stood and its people were heterogeneous and consensus bonds about common goals were not so strong.
Nevertheless, in practice in the democratic State of force does not take precedence, but the precedence is convincing (persuasion). The forced nature of the state, if attributed to the opinion of Philipus M Hadjon
The recognition that Indonesia is a country based on the law, with the consequences also of the recognition of the dignity and respect of people, the cycloat compel that there should be no obligations made by anyone against anyone. In the concuttings of the development of the legal system in Indonesia is always influenced by the political configuration, which by Moh. Mahfud MD states that political configuration is interpreted as the arrangement or constellation of political forces that are dichotomy divided into two diametrically conflicting concepts, i.e. democratic political configuration and authoritarian political configuration.
Furthermore, the configuration of democratic politics is the arrangement of political systems that open
(opportunity) for the participation of the people in full to actively determine the general wisdom, while the authoritarian political configuration is the arrangement of a political system that allows the state to be very active role and to take on almost all initiatives in the making of State wisdom.
Political configuration will affect legal products. Legal products that are responsive are legal products that reflect a sense of fairness and meet the expectations of society. This legal product is different from the conservative/orthopaedic/elitist legal product which is a legal product whose content is more reflective of the social vision of the political elite, more reflects the wishes of the Government, so it is more positivity-instrumentalia, namely to be the instrument of implementation of ideology and state programs.