Penelitian dalam tesis ini bertujua

Penelitian dalam tesis ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pengeluaran pemerintah dari belanja konsumsi dan belanja investasi serta realisasi investasi sektor swasta. Hasil analisis kemudian digunakan untuk mengetahui pengaruhnya terhadap tingkat kemiskinan (Y1) dan tingkat pengangguran (Y2) di 35 kabupaten kota di Provinsi Jawa Tengah dalam periode tahun 2008 sampai dengan tahun 2013 secara terpisah. Metode analisis menggunakan regresi data panel karena data berupa cross section dan time series dengan tiga variabel utama yaitu belanja konsumsi (X1) terdiri dari belanja barang (X11), belanja hibah (X12), bantuan sosial (X13) dan belanja investasi terdiri dari belanja peralatan mesin (X21), belanja bangunan gedung (X22), belanja jalan, jaringan, irigasi (X23), belanja aset tetap lainnya (X24) serta realisasi investasi sektor swasta (X3). Disamping variabel tersebut digunakan pula variabel akibat terjadinya lagtime namun hanya pada belanja investasi dan realisasi sektor swasta, variabel lagtime teridiri dari belanja peralatan mesin (X21), belanja bangunan gedung (X221), belanja jalan, jaringan, irigasi (X231), belanja aset tetap lainnya (X241) serta realisasi investasi sektor swasta (X31). Pengembangan hipotesa dari penelitian ini adalah diduga ada pengaruh negatif antara pengeluaran pemerintah dan realisasi investasi swasta terhadap tingkat kemiskinan dan tingkat pengangguran pada 35 Kabupaten Kota di Provinsi Jawa Tengah periode tahun 2008 sampai dengan tahun 2013 baik pada tahun yang bersangkutan maupun kondisi lagtime. Hasilnya pengeluaran pemerintah dan realisasi investasi swasta terbukti memiliki hubungan terbalik terhadap tingkat kemiskinan dan tingkat pengangguran secara bersama-sama dilihat dari hasil nilai Fhitung sebesar ... Dari perhitungan secara parsial dilihat dari uji thitung, variabel belanja barang (X11), belanja hibah (X12), bantuan sosial (X13), belanja peralatan mesin (X21), belanja bangunan gedung (X22), belanja jalan, jaringan, irigasi (X23), belanja aset tetap lainnya (X24), realisasi investasi sektor swasta (X3), belanja peralatan mesin (X21), belanja bangunan gedung (X221), belanja jalan, jaringan, irigasi (X231), belanja aset tetap lainnya (X241) serta realisasi investasi sektor swasta (X31) memiliki hubungan terbalik terhadap tingkat kemiskinan dan tingkat pengangguran. Namun variabel belanja barang (X11), belanja hibah (X12), bantuan sosial (X13), belanja peralatan mesin (X21), belanja bangunan gedung (X22), belanja jalan, jaringan, irigasi (X23), belanja aset tetap lainnya (X24), realisasi investasi sektor swasta (X3), belanja peralatan mesin (X21), belanja bangunan gedung (X221), belanja jalan, jaringan, irigasi (X231), belanja aset tetap lainnya (X241) serta realisasi investasi sektor swasta (X31) memiliki pengaruh positif, hal ini terjadi karena variabel tersebut tidak berdampak secara langsung pada tingkat kemiskinan dan tingkat pengangguran.
kata kunci : pengaruh pengeluaran pemerintah, tingkat kemiskinan dan tingkat pengangguran, 35 kabupaten kota, provinsi jawa tengah, regresi data panel.

Hasil (Inggris) 1:

The research in this thesis aims to acknowledge and analyse government spending from consumption spending and investment spending as well as the realization of private sector investment. Results of the analysis are then used to determine its influence on poverty levels (Y1) and the level of unemployment (Y2) in 35 districts of Central Java province in 2008 in the period up to the year 2013 separately. Methods of analysis using regression data because the data pane in the form of cross section and time series with three main variables i.e. shopping consumption (X 1) consists of shopping goods (X 11), expenditures of grant (X12), social assistance (X13) and the investment consists of a shopping cart (X 21) machine tools, shopping building (X 22), shopping streets, the irrigation network, (X23), shopping and other fixed assets (X24) as well as the realization of private sector investment (X 3). In addition to the variables used are variable due to the occurrence of lagtime but only on investment spending and the realization of the private sector, the variable contains the lagtime shopping equipment machines (X 21), shopping (X221) building, shopping streets, the irrigation network, (X231), shopping and other fixed assets (X241) as well as the realization of private sector investment (X31). The development of the hypothesis of this research is thought to have negative influence between government spending and private investment towards the realization of the poverty rate and unemployment rate in 35 Districts Of Central Java province in 2008 year period up to the year 2013 both in the year in question and the condition of the lagtime. Results of government spending and private investment has proved to be a realization relationship upside-down to the level of poverty and unemployment levels are jointly seen from the result value of Fhitung for the ... Calculation of partially seen from the thitung test, the variable shopping goods (X 11), expenditures of grant (X12), social assistance (X13), shopping (X 21) machine tools, shopping building (X 22), shopping streets, the irrigation network, (X23), shopping and other fixed assets (X24), the realization of private sector investment (X 3), shopping (X 21) machine tools, shopping building (X221), shopping streets, the irrigation network, (X231), shopping and other fixed assets (X241) as well as the realization of private sector investment (X31) has the reverse relationship of the level of poverty and unemployment levels. However the variable shopping goods (X 11), expenditures of grant (X12), social assistance (X13), shopping (X 21) machine tools, shopping building (X 22), shopping streets, the irrigation network, (X23), shopping and other fixed assets (X24), the realization of private sector investment (X 3), shopping (X 21) machine tools, shopping building (X221), shopping streets, the irrigation network, (X231), shopping and other fixed assets (X241) as well as the realization of private sector investment (X31) have a positive influence, this happens because those variables do not impact directly on the level of poverty and unemployment levels. Keywords: influence of government spending, the level of poverty and unemployment rate, 35 city Regency, Central Java province, panel data regression.