g. Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan Ang

g. Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan Angkutan Umum
Pengamatan Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan pada angkutan umum diperlukan untuk mengetahui kondisi terkait keselamatan objek angkutan umum yang diamati, kemudian dilakukan analisa berapa besar pemenuhan sistem manajemen keselamatanya. Pada penyusunan profil ini hanya ditampilkan contoh pengamatan SMK pada BRT Transmusi Kota Palembang.

2. Pilar II Aspek Jalan Berkeselamatan
Dalam mengetahui kondisi aspek jalan dilakukan Laik Fungsi Jalan (LFJ), berikut ini hasil LFJ yang dilakukan pada 12 ruas jalan:

Dari tabel di atas dilihat tiap ruas memiliki jumlah laik fungsi jalan yang berbeda dengan kategori yang sama. Penilaian kategori tersebut dilakukan dengan penilaian interval nilai yaitu sebagai berikut:
Nilai 0%-30% : Tidak Laik (TL)
Nilai 30%-95% :Laik Fungsi Bersyarat (LS)
Nilai 95%-100% : Laik Fungsi (LF)
Pembagian penilaian tersebut dilakukan untuk mempermudah penilaian. Sehingga tiap ruas jalanpun akan terlihat seberapa besar nilai yang dicapai dan seberapa kecilkan perolehan dari tiap aspek penilaiannya.
Untuk itulah dilakukan perankingan berdasarkan ruas jalan yang paling laik sampai ruas jalan yang memiliki nilai aik fungsi jalan paling rendah, yaitu sebagai berikut:

Hasil (Inggris) 1:

g. public transit Safety Management SystemObservation on the safety management System of public transport is required to know the condition of the safety-related objects of public transport are observed, then performed an analysis of how large the fulfillment management system keselamatanya. In preparation of this profile only be shown examples of observations of SMK on BRT Transmusi Palembang.2. Pillar II aspects of Road BerkeselamatanIn knowing the condition of the aspect of the way done be eligible to Function the way (LFJ), following the results of the LFJ conducted on 12 roads:From the table above the views of each segment have a number of different paths function be eligible with the same category. The assessment of these categories is carried out by the appraisal interval value that is as follows: A value of 0%-30%: not be eligible (TL) The value of 30%-95%: be eligible to Conditional Functions (LS) The value of 95%-100%: be eligible function (LF) Division of assessment is done to facilitate assessment. So that each segment will look jalanpun how big is the value achieved and how lower earnings from each aspect of assessment. That's done for perankingan based on most roads be eligible until the roads have the lowest road function aik, namely as follows:

Hasil (Inggris) 2:

g. Public Transport Safety Management System
Observation Safety Management System on public transport is needed to determine the condition of public transport safety-related objects were observed, and then analyzed how much fulfillment management system keselamatanya. In preparing this profile only shown an example of observation on the BRT Transmusi SMK Kota Palembang.

2. Pillar II Road Safety Aspects
In knowing the condition of the road do Eligible aspect Way Function (LFJ), the following results LFJ conducted in 12 road:

From the table above views each segment has a number of worthy function different paths to the same category. Rating categories are done with the assessment interval of values ​​is as follows:
A value of 0% -30%: Not Eligible (NE)
value of 30% -95%: Eligible Conditional Functions (LS)
value of 95% -100%: Eligible Function (LF)
Distribution the assessment carried out to facilitate assessment. Jalanpun so that each segment will be seen how much value achieved and how minimize the acquisition of every aspect of the assessment.
That was why a ranking based on the road most worthy to roads that have a value aik lowest road function, as follows: