Jumlah mahasiswa yang masih kurang

Jumlah mahasiswa yang masih kurang di lingkup Universitas Mataram, serta belum adaya sumber pendanaan lain berpengaruh terhadapa tingkat kesejahteraan dosen serta mekanismedalam pemenuhan kebutuhan dosen, karena minimnya dana yang dimiliki membuat mekanisme pemenuhan dosen belum terlaksana dengan baik dalam penerapan dan pelaksanaannya, baik sistem rekrutmen maupun seleksi yang dilaksanakan, adapun skor yang paling besar dari empat faktor kelemahan tersebut adalah belum tersediaya sumber pendapatan lain di Universitas 45 Mataram, diikuti dengan tidak tersedia dan dialokasikannya dana khusus dalam pemenuhan kebutuhan dosen sehingga SOP tidak terlaksana serta kesejahteraan dosen memadai.
Berdasarkan Tabel 2 ditunjukkan bahwa total skor IFAS adalah 2.45, nilai tersebut berada dibawah rata-rata (2.50) berarti bahwa kekuatan yang dimiliki untuk menentukan strategi pemenuhan kebutuhan dosen serta strategi dan langkah dalam menarik minat calon dosen menjadi dosen di Universitas 45 Mataram belum cukup kuat untuk menanggulangi kelemahan yang dimiliki. Sedangkan pada Tabel 3 ditunjukkan total skor EFAS sebesar 2.308. nilai tersebut bearada dibawah rata-rata (2.50) menunjukkan bahwa Universitas 45 Mataram belum maksimal dapat memanfaatkan peluang dan meminimalkan ancaman yang ada. Namun dari kedua skor tersebut, skor IFAS masih lebih besar dari pada skor EFAS, sehingga faktor internal masih lebih kuat dalam kombinasi dengan faktor eksternal.
Kombinasi dari faktor strategis internal dan eksternal selanjutnya dirumuskan ke dalam empat jenis strategi utama yang terbagi menjadi sebelas alternatif strategi pengembangan sistem pemenuhan kebutuhan dosen seperti nampak pada Tabel 4.

Hasil (Inggris) 1:

The number of students who are lacking in the scope of University of Mataram, and yet another funding source jedidah influential welfare levels as well as lecturer terhadapa mekanismedalam fulfillment of the needs of lecturers, because lack of funds belonging to make fulfillment mechanism has not been done with good professors in the implementation and its implementation, either a system of recruitment or selection carried out, as for the score of the four factors of weakness is yet another source of income tersediaya in Mataram University 45 , followed by not available and dialokasikannya funds specialized in fulfilling the needs of lecturers so that SOP was not done as well as the welfare of the lecturer.Based on table 2 indicated that the total score of IFAD was 2.45, those values were below average (2.80) means that the powers to determine fulfilment strategy lecturer as well as strategies and measures in the interest of prospective lecturers became a lecturer at the University of Mataram 45 has not been strong enough to overcome weaknesses. Whereas in table 3 is shown a total score of EFAS 2,308. the bearada value below the average (2.80) shows that yet maximum 45 University of Mataram can take advantage of the opportunities and minimize the threats that exist. But from the second score, the score still greater from IFAD on score EFAS, so internal factors is still more powerful in combination with external factors.A combination of internal and external strategic factors subsequently reformulated into four main strategy types are divided into eleven alternative fulfilment system development strategy lecturer as apparent on table 4.

Hasil (Inggris) 2:

The number of students who are still lacking in the scope of the University of Mataram, and yet Adaiah other funding sources affect terhadapa level of welfare of lecturers and mekanismedalam meet the needs of teachers, due to lack of funds owned makes compliance mechanism lecturer has not done well in the application and implementation, both the system of recruitment and selection implemented, while the score among the largest of the four factors of these weaknesses are not tersediaya source of income in the University 45 Mataram, followed by not available and the allocation of special funds in meeting the needs of teachers so SOP not performing as well as the welfare of lecturers adequate.
Based on Table 2 indicated that total score of IFAS is 2:45, the scores fall below the average (2.50) means that the power held to determine a strategy meeting the needs of lecturers as well as the strategies and actions in attracting prospective faculty as a lecturer at the University of 45 Mataram yet strong enough to overcome the weaknesses of the , Whereas in Table 3 are shown EFAS total score of 2,308. bearada value is below the average (2.50) shows that 45 Mataram University is not maximized can take advantage of opportunities and minimize threats. But of the two scores, a score of IFAs is still greater than the score of EFAS, so that internal factors are still more powerful in combination with external factors.
The combination of strategic factors internal and external then formulated into four types of major strategies that are divided into eleven alternative development strategy systems meeting the needs of lecturers as shown in Table 4.