Terus apakah tidak ada sisi burukny

Terus apakah tidak ada sisi buruknya? Pastilah ada. Lihat saja di tiap kemasan obat pasti tertera kontra indikasi dan efek sampingnya. Sinar X untuk rontgen bisa berefek negatif bagi tubuh, sinar Gamma untuk radioterapi punya manfaat bisa membunuh sel kanker tapi juga bisa memicu tumbuhnya sel kanker. Namun hal itu coba diatasi oleh pakar-pakarnya. Itulah kenapa radioterapi ada batas maksimalnya, dan dari satu paket ke paket yang lain ada jeda waktu yang cukup.

Kalau kita perhatikan obat-obatan untuk kemoterapi. Ini obat yang sangat keras, efek sampingnya pun tidak ringan, tapi itu sangat diperlukan karena memang penyakitnya yang ganas, sehingga memerlukan kekuatan obat yang jauh lebih tinggi dari keganasan penyakitnya. Apalagi obat tidak bisa milih, mana sel abnormal dan mana sel normal. Sel kanker dan sel-sel lain semuanya dihantam. Berdasarkan pengalaman, obat keras seperti itu punya batas tertentu dalam penggunaannya, yaitu manakala ‘kemampuannya menyembuhkan’ hampir sama dengan ‘kemampuannya merusak’. Jika sampai pada level seperti itu, maka perlu dikaji ulang, dicari alternatif yang lebih aman.

Hasil (Inggris) 1:

Keep if there are no bad side? Surely there are. Just look at every drug packaging definitely listed contraindications and side effects. X-rays to x-rays can negatively effect conferring to the body, Gamma Rays for radiotherapy have benefits could kill cancer cells but can also trigger the growth of cancer cells. Yet it was trying to overcome by pakar-pakarnya. That's why there is a maximum limit of radiotherapy, and from one package to another package there is a pause of time.If we look at the drugs for chemotherapy. This is a very hard drug, side effects were not lightly, but it is indispensable because it is fierce, so this ailment requiring strength medication that is much higher than the malignancy of his illness. Moreover, the drugs cannot select, where abnormal cells and where normal cells. Cancer cells and other cells are all being hit. Based on experience, as hard as it had a certain boundaries in its use, i.e., while ' ability to heal ' is similar to ' destructive ' ability. If a level like that, then it needs to be rethought, sought a safer alternative.

Hasil (Inggris) 2:

Continue if there is no bad side? Surely there. Just look at each package contained definitely drug contraindications and side effects. X-rays to X-rays can negatively affect the body, gamma rays for radiotherapy has benefits can kill cancer cells but can also trigger the growth of cancer cells. But it was dealt with by experts-experts. That is why radiotherapy is no maximum limit, and from one package to another package is no lag time.

If we look at drugs for chemotherapy. This medicine is very hard, no adverse effects were mild, but it is necessary because it is the malignant disease, thus requiring the power of drugs is much higher than the ferocity of his illness. Moreover, the drug can not choose, where abnormal cells and where normal cells. Cancer cells and other cells are all being hit. Based on experience, hard drugs like it's got a certain extent in use, ie when 'ability to heal' almost equal 'ability to destroy'. When it comes to such a level, it needs to be reexamined, look for safer alternatives.